The aim of this study was to assess decision-making styles of consumers when purohasing products mannfacturer based on Asprvlz and Kendall' s.The present study that a survey with a cross-sectional study, and conducted in the field, statistical population of this study was consisted of men and women over than 15 years old in the sports stores in Shiraz so the sample size was calculated to estimate the sample size formula based, (sample size 385). A questionnaire entitled consumer style inventory (CSI), which was made by Sproles and Kenddall (1986). And in this research was used Descriptive and inferential statistical statistical methods ((Binomial test and Friedman test). Study indicate that customers in the styles of decision-making Known brands in sensitivit, Talib Lztgra shopping as a hobby and price sensitivity they follow Sproles and Kenddall High sensitivity, loyal to a rand response the careless, wandering in a lot of choices and model do not follow Sproles and Kenddall. (p<0.01).In fact, consumers are looking for new products in stores and sporting goods are luxury and Shopping is fun for them. The value for their money and expect in return for the money it pays to buy the best quality products.

This study aimed to identify decision-making styles of sporting wears consumers’ . The qualitative study method by Grounded Theory approach was used. For this purpose, semi-structured and non-structured interviews had done by three groups of respondents, including marketing and sports marketing professionals, Producers-Distributors and customers of sporting wears (n=56). Purposeful and Snowball sampling continued until theoretical saturation. Data analyze was done using interpretive analysis methods through open, axial and selective coding techniques. Interpretive analysis led to the identification of 93 items that were pooled in 15 categories. The 15 categories were presented as a qualitative model for consumer decisions making styles. The model showed up while purchasing sport swear customers can follow styles such as; convenient access, qualityoriented, fashion-oriented, nationalism, searcher, respect oriented, diversityoriented, sensuality, luxury-oriented, hedonism, price sensitive, brand-oriented, confusion, and effectiveness. Some styles presented in this study correspond with previous studies in various fields. However, some of them such as effectiveness, sensuality and luxury-oriented rarely has been mentioned in previous studies. In general, consumers purchase decision making styles can be more extensive and more various than existing Consumer decision making styles.

Background :Identifying the internal factors of gender murders in the face of marital infidelity is of special importance. Objectives :Therefore, the present study aimed to anticipate risky decision-making styles in gender murderers and divorce demandants with a history of marital infidelity. Materials and Methods :The present research is a descriptive design of the discriminant analysis type. The statistical community includes all men accused of gender murders and people divorce demandants from marital infidelity in Ahvaz. Hence, 86 people were selected using the judgmental sampling method. The ultimatum game and scale of risky decision styles in social situations were used to anticipate risky decision styles. The data were analyzed with SPSS 24 software. Results :The results showed that there was a significant difference in health risk between the study groups. However, there is no significant difference in other components of risky decision-making, such as ambiguity, diversification, and economic risk-taking between the groups examined. Conclusions :Risk appetite and risky decision-making styles are among the psychological and intrinsic factors that can play a prominent role in the occurrence of gender murders alongside other sociological factors. Accordingly, the identification of psychological factors affecting the risky decision-making style can be effective in prognosis and the prevention of such murders.

Introduction: the aim of the present study reviews the effectiveness of critical thinking training on problem solving styles anddecision making styles.Methods: statistical research community includes all undergraduate students of the Bachelor of the Payame noor University of Tehran in academic year 94-95 who were among 40 students to the methods of random sample selected using multi-stage cluster store with cloud-based research plan of the type before the test – so the test with the control group in a experiment and control groups were appointed (20 students in tests and 20 students in the control group). Interventions relating to the training of critical thinking for a 45 minute training sessions during the two-week meeting on the students Group conducted tests. Used tools, problem-solving style questionnaire Cassidy and long (1996) anddecision making styles questionnaire Scott & Bruce (1995). the data obtained by statistical analysis method of case analysis.Findings: the results of the study showed a significant difference between the groups (MANCOVA). The test results also suggest the existence of a single the difference was significant in both variables.result: the result of the combination of the student's abilities and critical thinking, to maximize it is to promote total decision making styles, logical decision making style and problem solving styles leads. so it can be acknowledged that with the growth and progress of critical thinking as level and capabilities from and effective problem solving, levels total decision making styles, logical decision making style students also will be upgraded. On the other hand non-constructive style avoidance and intuitive problem-solving and decision-making style of avoidance and intuitive other hand, felt.